domingo, 23 de octubre de 2016

Portfolio entry # 18 "TED and walls"


Hugh Evan is part of an organization called "Global citizens" that self-identifies not as a member of a state, nation or tribe but as a member of the human race; and his main point is that global issues such as poverty, climate change or gender inequality to name a few, "can only be solved by global citizens demanding global solutions from their leaders." Hugh Evan started founding this idea of helping the others in his heart when he was a child, and then he could extend his dream to reality. He believes that sometimes people want to act, but they do not know how to do it or they think their actions will have no effect. For that reason, Evans supports the idea that people have to be activated and work together to put pressure on the leaders of the world to came up with global solutions to global issues. All people need is organization, motivation and passion. 

Being a citizen means acting and that is what Davinia, a Jamaican girl, decided to do. She inspired a lot of other global citizens, and together, they pesuaded the World Bank to invest into water and sanitation in India. This encouraged a double investment into girl's education in Norway and polio eradication in different countries. But there is still a lot to do for the entire world, and Hugh sustains that we can all make a positive change and not just look after of our own backyard.

In my opinion, Hugh Evans' idea is great but too idealistic. Poverty and indiference hurts but as he says, if we want a change, we have to work together and inspire each other. However, I believe that if we want to change the world, first, we have to face an absolute change of mind and overcome the political, cultural, social and economical differences that separates us as well as to assume that we are all part of a same race and a same world, and that it is our responsability as members of the society to look after the other. Unfortunately, we are more and more individualistic and are focused on taking care of our backyards and we do not look aside.

Source:

Evans, H. What does it mean being a citizen of the world?. February 2016. Retrieved from TED website: https://www.ted.com/talks/hugh_evans_what_does_it_mean_to_be_a_citizen_of_the_world?language=es

Portfolio entry # 17 "Sidewalls"

Resultado de imagen para medianeras
"Medianeras" is an Argentinian film written and directed by Gustavo Taretto. It is about two lonely, phobic and dissapointed people, Martin and Mariana, who are made for each other. However, they are so closed and focused on their inner conflicts, plus the fact that life in a city is so busy, that it will be difficult for them to establish  stable relationships. Not until they are able to abandon their lifestyles and break and look beyond the sidewalls (the physical and the imaginary ones), they will know each other. The scenes that impacted me most were when Mariana is observing the doll inside the box on her key-chain, since it was how she was living, closed in the walls made of concrete and the walls made of phobias. And the other one, when Martin opens Astroboy toy´s package, as I consider it is the moment he realizes that he has to open his own package.

The film invites us to reflect on the issues of loneliness, individualism and technology. Many times we are surrounded by a lot of people but we continue feeling alone, trying to fill the gaps with work or casual relationships to name a few. In addition, we are so centered on our lives and so hurried all the time, that there is no place and no time to stop and look aside to see if the other need us. Still technology, that was made to shorten distances, ended up enlarging them. Nowadays, relationships are more superficial and contact face to face is not so frequent as in past times. We are divided by different sidewalls; it is our job to knock them down and live together as happy and satisfied as possible.

sábado, 22 de octubre de 2016

Portfolio entry # 16 "World of walls"


Sixty-five countries have built walls on their borders to "protect" themselves from immigrants, refugees, terrorists or to separate each other according their religious beliefs. The writer Marcello Di Cintio asserts that "Their main function is theatre. They provide the sense of security, not real security." The effectiveness of the walls is limited. It has been proved through the fact that people tend to climb the walls simply to disturb the others, as in the case of the Palestinians; or to intend crossing these fences no matter what, as the migrants on the border between Morocco and Melilla. 

However, what shocked me most was the barrier that Macedonia adopted to block the border with Greece. Not only they placed wire on the ground, but they also send a riot police to prevent people crossing into the country. On the photographs and video, we can perfectly appreciate the brutality, agression and despair on people. The barbed-wire fence in India and the mines along the fence between Morocca and Western Sahara are the two other cases that  affected me. I consider that walls are not the solution to criminals, immigrants or refugees or to the different difficulties that countries have to face, but they even deepen more and more the differences between the two sides. As a matter of fact, I do not think that these walls are going to be pulled down; on the contrary, politicians seem to believe that these fences are the best strategies to be implemented. Even in Argentina a wall to separate Jujuy from Bolivia is going to be erected. To conclude, I did not know that so many walls existed, and I think that even more ones will be built in a near future.


Source: 

Tomlinson, S., World of walls. August 2015. Retrieved from Mail online website: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3205724/How-65-countries-erected-security-walls-borders.html

viernes, 21 de octubre de 2016

Portfolio entry # 15 - Poem: "I build walls"

The construction of walls are not always made of brick, stone, or any other material. Sometimes we create imaginary barriers as a way to hide who we are or how we feel or to protect ourselves.

Why would someone build "walls"aruond his or her feelings?
     Walls create the feeling of being protected. In some cases, people might build walls around their feelings because they do not trust on others and fear being hurt. Sometimes, they could be more introverted and repress their emotions because they do not know how to demonstrate what they feel or they do not want to look like a fool. And still in some instatnces, they might prefer to hide their feelings in order not to share what they really are or feel as a safer way to cope with life.

Do you, or others you know, ever build such "walls"?
    I used to be a person who built walls around me (and sometimes it is still difficult for me to demonstrate what I feel). I considered that if I kept that shell around me, I would be protected of everything and I would show that I was self-sufficient. However I realised that while nobody could go into my boundaries, I could not go out either. It was a long and difficult process until I assumed that I need the contact with my family, my friends or other people to protect each other, to enjoy life, or to overcome difficult situations.

Do you think that there are times that we need to uild walls?
    I think that there are times it is necessary to build these barriers to prevent that certain emotions, attitudes, words or actions affect our lives but mainly our health. Sometimes it is necessary to use these walls as temporary and protective shields without allowing them to become our prisons.

Portfolio entry #14 "Across the Great Divide"


The title of the article "Across the Great divide" refers to the division that still exists between East Germany and West Germany, despite the fact that the Belin Wall had been blown down many years ago. The fall of physical barrier seems not to have knocked down the social, economical, cultural and political ones. The differences between the two sides are still of notable consideration.

As regards the macroestructure, the article is made up of twelve paragraphs.
The first two paragraphs deal with Berliners' personal experiences: these paragraphs are devoted to explain what the daily lives of an Ossi ans a Wessi are like.
The third paragraph illustrates the current physical condition of the Wall.
From the fourth to the tenth paragraph, the social, cultural, political and enocomical situation after the Fall of the Wall. More precicely, paragraphs number four and five give an explanation of the political division; paragraph number six and ten deal with a sociocultural analysis; the following three paragraphs depict the socioeconomical situation; the eleventh, states the invesment of money on reunification; and the last paragraph reveals the similar attitudes that the western and easter Berliners share.

Source: Wallace, Ch. (1999). "Across the Great Divide" in Time. Nov. 15. pp 22-26.

viernes, 14 de octubre de 2016

Portfolio entry # 13 - Argumentative Essay: Death Penalty


Death Penalty
The death penalty has always been an issue of controversial debate. It is a practice that has been used all over the world and consists of executing someone because of the crime which the accused has committed. In the last two years, one hundred and forty countries had abolished the death penalty in law or practice, while the number of retentionist countries ascend to fifty-eight being China, India,Indonesia and the United States some of the countries that conform the latter group. The question would be: Can we teach a child not to hit by hitting him? The abolition of capital punishment has to be adopted by all the countries since it is unethical, irreversible, and it does not deter crime.

According to the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights, every human being has the right to life. Sentencing a person to death would be violating this basic human right and taking a life back would be revenge not justice. Of course the victim has also been deprived from this inalienable right, but capital punishment is an extreme and unique measure that applies to all, killers, rapists, and every criminal. It is a primitive and cruel punishment that tortures the condemned, not only for the practice itself but for the waiting of the death. Alternative measures such as imprisonment for life with no option for parole or community work should be taken into consideration as the death penalty has no turning back and the offenders should be given the possibility of restoring their bad behaviour. Besides, the death penalty is a discriminatory practice that takes primarily, the life of black and poor people. In the southern states of the United States, eight per cent of the black criminals get the death penalty while only one per cent of white criminals get capital punishment. In addition, a study released by researchers from the University of North Carolina demonstrated that the race of the victim was a crucial factor in who received the death penalty. As regards the social class, people who can afford expensive and experienced lawyers have better opportunities to avoid capital punishment than those who cannot have access to a good legal assistance.

Irreversibility is another key aspect in favour of the abolition of the death penalty. Nobody deserves to die, nor those who have killed for fun neither those who have killed for self profit; and under no circumstances those who have committed no crime. Mistakes or failures in the judicial system may kill innocent people. For instance, imprisonment is the only way to partial compensations for those who can prove their innocence. It can be argued that  the chance of making a mistake is quite low; However once the death penalty is put into practice, there is nothing that can be done to repair the punishment if the alleged perpetrator turns out to be innocent.

Still Capitall punishment will not prevent criminals from murdering, raping, or having any kind of condemnable behaviour. Offenders do not always think or act rationally, or they do not fear being caught or punished. A research released in 1988 and updated in 1996, failed to prove that executions were more effective than life imprisonment to control crimes. Imprisonment is the only chance to deter crime and to offer the offenders the possibility to make up for their crimes.

To conclude, the death penalty do not ensure the safety of the society. The threat of an extreme punishment is not the solution to decrease the crime rate and nobody should be dispossessed from his right to life. Violence should not be counter with violence. Resurrection is not possible, so the abolition of capital punishment is the guarantee that innocent people have to continue enjoying their lives once their innocence has been proved. 

Sources

“Abolitionist and retentionist countries” (2016). Retrieved from Death penalty information center website: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/

BBC (2014). Ethics: Capital Punishment. Retrieved from BBC website: http:// www. bbc. co.uk/ethics/ capitalpunishment/

“Capital Punishment Essay: Benefits of the Death Penalty.” (2016). Retrieved from 123HelpMe website: http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=3686

McCann, E. B. (2016),”Death penalty.” Retrieved from Amnesty International website: https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/death-penalty/

Michael, F. (n.d) “The Death Penalty.” Retrieved from Teen Ink website: http: //www.teenink.com/opinion/all/article/11085/The-Death-Penalty/

Mohanty, S. P., (n.d.) “Advantages and disadvantages of the Death Penalty.” Retrieved from: http://www.finanacecareonline.com/2013/07/advantages - and- disadvantages-of-death.html

“Should the death penalty be restored in the UK” (2016). Retrieved from English for university.com website: http://englishforuniversity.com/academic-writing/example-academicessay/

viernes, 2 de septiembre de 2016

Portfolio entry # 12 A video - Death penalty

Key words: death penalty; crime; crime rate; criminal chaos; abolish; capital punishment; irreversible; execution; horror; human right; torture; equality; human being.

Key phrases: "When a country abolishes death penalty they are not plunged into criminal chaos. " "Every one has the right to live and no one should be subjected to torture." "The death penalty is irreversible." "They crossed the line but we do really want to join them?"

In the following video, Jeremy Irons talks about death penalty and outlines his arguments against it saying that:
- Death penalty does not guarantee a lower crime rate. Even if it did, it would not be acceptable.
- Irreversibility is an important point to consider since you cannot bring back the dead. 
- Inadequate legal representation means capital punishment.
- The abuse of a basic human right is evident: the right to live.
- The panic of waiting for your death implies a psychological and physical torture.
- Equality means human rights are applied to all human beings. Equality is not social discrimination. Equality is not arbitrariness.
- People and the judicial system should be able to differentiate imprisonment and execution.